科研总结系列｜2-GPT学术写作提示词集锦手册
科研总结系列｜2-GPT学术写作提示词集锦手册
一、前言
随着生成式人工智能（如 ChatGPT）的迅速发展，学术写作正变得更加智能和高效。高质量的学术论文不仅能够准确传达研究成果，也会在学术圈内带来更广泛的影响力。借助 GPT 等工具，研究者能够更轻松地完善行文逻辑、丰富语言表达，并在多次迭代中不断打磨出更具说服力和可读性的学术文本。
本手册的目的是为读者整理一系列常用的提示词（Prompts），帮助在学术写作与审稿过程中更好地与 GPT 协作。通过精心设计和分类的提示词示例，笔者希望为研究者提供一份快捷、实用的参考指南，使其在撰写和润色论文、进行同行评审辅助以及编辑反馈优化等方面都能有效地提升写作效率与质量。
二、学术写作提示词
2.1 学术写作润色
本章将围绕学术写作中最常见的润色需求，给出详细且专业的提示词（Prompts）。这些提示词覆盖了语法、逻辑、风格、特定期刊要求等多个方面，帮助研究者在不同层面打磨论文。以下所有 Prompt 同时提供中文和英文版本，并尽量在同一段中一次性说明清楚需求，便于 GPT 完整理解并输出高质量结果。
2.1.1 句法与语法精修
2.1.1.1 复杂句与主被动语态转换
【中文 Prompt】
“作为一名资深的学术写作与语言润色专家，请协助我优化以下文本中的句子结构：在保证学术严谨度的前提下，减少冗长或不必要的从句，必要时将主动语态与被动语态灵活转换，以使整段文字既保持专业水准，又具有更好的可读性和流畅度。请注意在处理复杂句时，避免过度简化关键学术内容，同时确保逻辑清晰、表意准确。”
【English Prompt】
“As an experienced academic writing and language editing specialist, please help me improve the sentence structure in the following text. While maintaining scholarly rigor, reduce overly long or unnecessary subordinate clauses, and appropriately switch between active and passive voice for better readability and coherence. When handling complex sentences, avoid oversimplifying critical academic content, ensuring logical clarity and precise meaning.”
2.1.1.2 主谓一致与时态一致
【中文 Prompt】
“作为一名具备高级语法审校能力的学术写作顾问，请在审阅下列文本时重点关注主谓一致和时态使用是否正确。若发现引言与结论应使用一般现在时、方法与结果应使用一般过去时的场合，请帮助进行相应调整，并对不符合主谓一致原则的句子进行改写。请在保持学术语气的同时，保证行文自然流畅。”
【English Prompt】
“As an advanced grammar reviewer specializing in academic writing, please focus on ensuring subject-verb agreement and correct tense usage in the following text. Where necessary, adjust the tense to present simple for the introduction and conclusion, and past tense for methods and results. Also revise any sentences that do not follow proper subject-verb agreement. Maintain a formal academic tone while ensuring the text remains clear and fluent.”
2.1.1.3 标点符号与拼写检查
【中文 Prompt】
“作为一名资深语言编辑，请帮助我检查下列学术文本的标点符号和拼写是否规范。请注意逗号、分号、破折号以及引号的正确用法，并确保不存在错别字或专业名词拼写错误。若有需要进一步澄清的术语或拼写用法，也请提出改进建议并加以说明。”
【English Prompt】
“As a seasoned language editor, please review the punctuation and spelling of the following academic text. Pay special attention to the correct usage of commas, semicolons, em dashes, and quotation marks, and verify that there are no misspellings or incorrect professional terms. If there are ambiguous terms or spelling conventions that need clarification, please provide improvement suggestions and explanations.”
2.1.2 逻辑连贯性与论证结构
2.1.2.1 段落衔接与过渡
【中文 Prompt】
“作为一名专门从事论文结构优化的学术顾问，请帮助我在下列文本各段之间添加合适的过渡语句与连接词，确保每段话题紧密相连；同时请检查段落主题句与总结句是否充分体现核心观点。若发现个别段落与前后文脱节或有跳跃逻辑，请提出相应修改建议，以改善整体连贯性。”
【English Prompt】
“As a consultant specializing in paper structure optimization, please help me insert appropriate transitional phrases and linking words between the paragraphs of the following text, ensuring a cohesive flow of ideas. Also check whether each paragraph’s topic sentence and concluding sentence clearly convey the main points. If you find any paragraphs disconnected from the surrounding context or containing logical leaps, propose revisions to enhance overall coherence.”
2.1.2.2 论点的展开与支持
【中文 Prompt】
“作为一位资深学术写作教练，请审核以下文本中每段提出的论点是否得到充分的数据或文献支持。若发现论点缺乏引用或事例说明，请指出具体位置并建议补充必要的参考文献或实例；同时帮助我优化说明性语句，以便增强说服力和可信度。”
【English Prompt】
“As a seasoned academic writing coach, please review whether each argument in the following text is sufficiently supported by data or literature. If you notice any arguments lacking citations or examples, highlight the specific locations and recommend adding the necessary references or illustrations. Also help me refine explanatory sentences to strengthen persuasiveness and credibility.”
2.1.2.3 反驳与对比论证
【中文 Prompt】
“作为一名具有丰富论文审稿经验的专家，请检查以下文本中是否适当地对不同观点进行阐述、比较或反驳。若论文只呈现单一立场，缺乏对立或补充性观点的讨论，请建议在何处添加对比论证或反驳段落；同时请插入合理的过渡短语，以确保正反观点在行文中获得平衡、有效地强化论文整体论证。”
【English Prompt】
“As an expert with extensive manuscript review experience, please verify whether the following text sufficiently presents, compares, or refutes different perspectives. If it solely advocates a single standpoint without discussing counterarguments or supplementary viewpoints, recommend where to add contrasting or rebuttal paragraphs. Also insert appropriate transitional phrases to ensure a balanced treatment of opposing views, effectively strengthening the overall argumentation of the paper.”
2.1.3 学术风格与专业语气
2.1.3.1 避免口语化表达
【中文 Prompt】
“作为一名学术写作语言风格导师，请审阅以下文本，识别并替换可能显得口语化或随意化的短语和词汇，用更正式、专业且学术风格的语言加以改写。请提供必要的替换建议，使文本既保持学术严谨，又具备流畅易读的特点。”
【English Prompt】
“As a language style mentor in academic writing, please review the following text to identify and replace any colloquial or casual phrases or terms with more formal and scholarly equivalents. Provide appropriate substitution suggestions to ensure the text retains academic rigor while remaining clear and readable.”
2.1.3.2 专业术语与简练用词
【中文 Prompt】
“作为一位对专业术语与精准表述十分敏感的高级学术编辑，请帮我审查以下文本中的专业术语使用是否恰当，并检查是否有频率过高、累赘或不必要的复杂词汇。若发现可用更简练且同样专业的词来替换，请给出具体建议，并保持文意准确一致。”
【English Prompt】
“As a senior academic editor with a keen eye for professional terminology and concise expression, please review the following text to determine whether specialized terms are used appropriately and whether any words are overly frequent, redundant, or unnecessarily complex. If simpler yet equally professional wording can be used, provide specific recommendations while preserving accuracy and consistency.”
2.1.3.3 引用风格与一致性
【中文 Prompt】
“作为一名熟悉多种学术引用规范（如 APA、MLA、Chicago）的编辑，请帮助我检查以下文本在引文格式、尾注或脚注方面是否符合对应的引用标准。请确保同一篇文献在全篇使用统一的格式，并对常见失误（例如作者姓名拼写、年份不一致）进行校正。若发现引用信息缺失或不完整，也请提出建议。”
【English Prompt】
“As an editor well-versed in various academic citation styles (e.g., APA, MLA, Chicago), please review the referencing format, endnotes, or footnotes in the following text to confirm adherence to the chosen style guidelines. Ensure that each cited source is consistently formatted, and correct common errors such as misspellings of authors’ names or inconsistent publication years. If you notice missing or incomplete citation details, please provide recommendations.”
2.1.4 段落与结构优化
2.1.4.1 段落拆分与合并
【中文 Prompt】
“作为一名注重文本逻辑与可读性的学术排版专家，请帮助我审阅以下段落结构，判断哪些段落需要拆分以避免信息过载，哪些段落可合并以减少重复与冗长。请确保在段落拆分或合并后仍能维持主题连贯，并保留学术论述的完整性。”
【English Prompt】
“As an academic layout specialist focused on logical flow and readability, please evaluate the paragraph structure in the following text to determine which paragraphs should be split to avoid information overload and which should be merged to reduce redundancy and length. Ensure that the text remains coherent and preserves the integrity of the academic argument after these revisions.”
2.1.4.2 章节顺序与层次
【中文 Prompt】
“作为一位熟悉学术论文整体结构与章节逻辑的顾问，请检查下列文本中各章节（如引言、方法、结果、讨论）的顺序与层次是否合乎通常学术规范。若发现有小节不紧扣中心主题或出现跳跃式安排，请建议合理的调整方案并说明调整依据，以确保研究内容具备清晰连贯的论证脉络。”
【English Prompt】
“As a consultant familiar with the overall structure and chapter logic of academic papers, please evaluate whether the arrangement and hierarchy of sections (e.g., Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion) in the following text conform to common academic standards. If any subsections deviate from the central theme or appear disjointed, recommend a suitable reorganization strategy and explain the rationale behind it to maintain a coherent flow of arguments.”
2.1.4.3 提高可读性的排版建议
【中文 Prompt】
“作为一名专业排版与文档设计师，请根据以下文本内容，给出能提高阅读体验的具体建议，例如是否使用项目符号、编号列表、表格或图示来展示复杂信息。若有必要，请简要说明如何利用标题层次、字体或行距设置来提升文章整体可读性和视觉效果，但仍需保持学术文档的严谨性。”
【English Prompt】
“As a professional layout and document design specialist, please suggest specific improvements to the following text that will enhance the reading experience, such as employing bullet points, numbered lists, tables, or figures to present complex information. Where necessary, briefly explain how to use heading levels, font choices, or line spacing to improve overall readability and visual appeal without compromising the academic rigor of the document.”
2.1.5 修辞与写作风格打磨
2.1.5.1 同义词替换与词汇多样性
【中文 Prompt】
“作为一位具有丰富词汇库与写作经验的学术润色专家，请帮助我在以下文本中找到重复使用的关键词或短语，并推荐恰当的同义词或近义短语进行替换，以提升词汇多样性。请注意在替换时保持语境和学科术语的精确性，避免因用词不当造成歧义。”
【English Prompt】
“As an academic editing specialist with an extensive vocabulary and writing experience, please identify frequently repeated keywords or phrases in the following text and recommend suitable synonyms or closely related phrases to enhance lexical diversity. While replacing, ensure that the contextual meaning and disciplinary terminology remain accurate, avoiding ambiguities caused by inappropriate word choices.”
2.1.5.2 强调与弱化
【中文 Prompt】
“作为一位深谙学术语气调整的写作教练，请在审阅以下文本时，辨别出需要进一步强调或弱化的语句。若某些论点或结论需要更强烈的语气来突出其重要性，请提出建议；若有些表述需要放缓或谨慎处理（如不确定性、局限性部分），也请指出合适的词汇或表达方式，以准确传达作者对该问题的把握程度。”
【English Prompt】
“As a writing coach adept at adjusting academic tone, please review the following text to identify sentences that should be further emphasized or downplayed. If certain arguments or conclusions need a stronger expression of importance, propose suitable modifications; likewise, if some statements require more cautious or nuanced language (e.g., when addressing uncertainties or limitations), recommend appropriate words or expressions to accurately convey the author’s degree of certainty.”
2.1.5.3 语言的简洁性
【中文 Prompt】
“作为一位追求高效表达的学术写作顾问，请帮助我在以下文本中识别并精简赘余词句，确保每个句子都紧扣核心主题，避免不必要的重复或华而不实的修饰。请在保证原意不受损害的前提下，对长句进行适度拆分或合并，并提供改写示例，以提升整体的明晰度与可读性。”
【English Prompt】
“As an academic writing consultant focused on concise expression, please help me identify and eliminate superfluous phrases in the following text, ensuring each sentence addresses the core topic without unnecessary repetition or overly ornate language. While preserving the original meaning, split or merge long sentences where needed, providing rewritten examples that improve clarity and readability.”
2.1.6 特定学科或期刊要求
2.1.6.1 医学、社会科学、工程等学科写作差异
【中文 Prompt】
“作为一位熟悉多种学科写作风格的学术编辑，请针对以下文本所在的研究领域，指出其在写作上可能需要符合的特定规范（例如医学类注重严谨的研究设计表述，社会科学类强调理论框架说明，工程类偏重技术细节等）。请帮我根据该领域的通用标准提出具体的写作风格调整建议，以更契合该学科的惯用表达和审稿要求。”
【English Prompt】
“As an academic editor familiar with various disciplinary writing styles, please identify the specific conventions that the following text should adhere to based on its field of study (e.g., rigorous methodological descriptions in medical papers, a well-defined theoretical framework in social sciences, or a focus on technical details in engineering). Offer concrete suggestions to adjust the writing style according to common practices and review criteria in that domain.”
2.1.6.2 期刊偏好与格式
【中文 Prompt】
“作为一位了解不同期刊要求的论文润色顾问，请在审阅以下文本时，考量目标期刊在字数限制、主题关注点与引用风格等方面的偏好。若发现文本长度、行文方式或参考文献格式与该期刊要求不匹配，请给出针对性的修改方案，包括精简段落、调整学术用语或转换引文格式等。”
【English Prompt】
“As a paper editing consultant knowledgeable about various journal requirements, please review the following text with regard to the target journal’s word count constraints, thematic focus, and citation style preferences. If the text’s length, style, or references do not align with the journal guidelines, provide specific recommendations, such as condensing paragraphs, modifying academic language, or switching to a different citation format.”
2.1.6.3 多语言环境
【中文 Prompt】
“作为一名精通多语言学术写作的专家，请帮助我检查以下文本在中英文之间（或其他语言组合）是否存在术语或表述的不一致问题。若某些专有名词或概念需要在译文中精确对应，请保持统一并标注出处；若不同语言的写作风格存在显著差异，请提出相应的调整建议，以确保学术内容在多语言环境中呈现的准确与连贯。”
【English Prompt】
“As an expert proficient in multilingual academic writing, please help me verify whether there are any inconsistencies in terms or expressions between English and Chinese (or other language pairs) in the following text. For any specialized terminology or concepts that require precise equivalences in translation, ensure consistency and provide references. If significant stylistic differences exist between the languages, propose adjustments to maintain accuracy and coherence of the academic content across multilingual contexts.”
2.2 同行评审辅助
在学术研究的同行评审流程中，利用 GPT 可以模拟资深专家的视角，对论文的核心内容、研究设计、方法论以及数据分析等部分进行审查和反馈。以下提示词将帮助您快速生成高质量的同行评审意见，既能凸显专业性，也可为作者提供切实可行的改进建议。
2.2.1 模拟资深专家审稿
【中文 Prompt】
“假设您是一位在 [研究领域] 拥有 20 年学术经验的资深专家学者，请基于我对这篇论文的简要概述，写出一份详细的同行评审报告。报告应包括：1）论文的研究背景与核心贡献；2）研究方法的合理性与科学性评价；3）数据分析或结果是否可信及其理由；4）论文目前存在的不足或局限性，并提出可行的改进建议。请保持学术专业且客观的语气。”
【English Prompt】
“Assume you are a seasoned scholar with 20 years of experience in the field of [Research Area]. Based on my brief summary of this paper, please draft a detailed peer review report that covers: (1) the research background and the paper’s main contributions; (2) an evaluation of the methodological rigor and scientific validity; (3) the credibility of the data analysis or results and the reasons behind your assessment; and (4) the paper’s limitations or weaknesses, along with practical suggestions for improvement. Maintain a professional and objective tone throughout.”
2.2.2 论文结构与论点剖析
【中文 Prompt】
“作为一名对论文逻辑结构和论点展开有深入见解的专家，请对以下论文进行审阅并着重评论：1）论文的整体结构是否符合常见的学术规范；2）论点的层次是否清晰、递进有序；3）引言、文献综述、方法、结果、讨论等部分之间的衔接是否紧密。若有结构性的缺陷（如缺少关键章节或缺乏过渡段落），请具体指出并给出改进策略，以确保论文论证链条的完整。”
【English Prompt】
“As an expert with deep insights into the logical structure and argument development of academic papers, please review the following manuscript and focus on: (1) whether its overall structure aligns with common scholarly standards; (2) the clarity and logical progression of the arguments; and (3) the coherence among the Introduction, Literature Review, Methods, Results, and Discussion sections. If any structural flaws (e.g., missing key sections or lacking transitional paragraphs) are identified, please specify them and propose enhancements to ensure a complete chain of reasoning.”
2.2.3 提升研究设计与数据分析
【中文 Prompt】
“作为一名在研究设计与数据分析方面经验丰富的同行评审专家，请帮助我评估以下论文：1）研究问题与假设是否合理且具有创新性；2）研究设计（包括实验设计、问卷调查或数据采集方式等）是否能够有效验证该假设；3）数据分析方法是否恰当，统计结果是否具有足够的信度和效度。若发现不完善之处，请提出改进或替代方案，并简要说明原因。”
【English Prompt】
“As a peer reviewer with extensive experience in research design and data analysis, please evaluate the following paper by considering: (1) whether the research question and hypotheses are both reasonable and innovative; (2) whether the study design (including experimental setup, survey method, or data collection strategy) sufficiently addresses these hypotheses; and (3) whether the data analysis approach is appropriate and the statistical results are reliable and valid. If any shortcomings are identified, propose improvements or alternatives, providing a brief rationale.”
2.2.4 全面审稿意见汇总
【中文 Prompt】
“基于对论文各方面（研究背景、文献综述、方法、结果、讨论、参考文献）的综合审阅，请撰写一份全面的同行评审意见，指出论文的亮点与贡献之处，同时阐明需要进一步完善或修改的主要问题，并按重要程度排列。建议在每个问题后附上可能的解决方案或思路，以便作者能高效地对论文进行修订。”
【English Prompt】
“Drawing on a comprehensive review of all aspects of the manuscript (research background, literature review, methodology, results, discussion, and references), please compose a thorough peer review that highlights the paper’s strengths and contributions, while also addressing the primary issues needing further refinement or revision in order of importance. For each issue, include potential solutions or suggestions so that the authors can effectively improve their work.”
2.3 编辑反馈优化
在学术期刊编辑或审稿人角色下，撰写反馈信或审稿意见时，需要兼具专业性、礼貌性和指导性。以下提示词将帮助您生成更具条理性、建设性和可读性的反馈内容，为作者或投稿人提供清晰的修改方向。相较于其他环节，编辑反馈往往直接影响作者对论文修订的理解与执行，因此我们在此提供更为详尽的 Prompt，覆盖从初步意见到最终退修或接受等多种情境。
2.3.1 拒稿信（Rejection Letter）
【中文 Prompt】
“作为一名负责稿件初筛和终审决策的期刊编辑，请在审阅以下稿件的基础上，起草一封拒稿信。信中需要：1）简要概括稿件的主题和主要结论；2）指出导致拒稿的关键原因，如研究新颖性不足、方法不严谨、数据不充分或结论不够扎实；3）保持尊重与客观的语气，同时给出可行的改进建议，让作者理解如何提升后续的研究或稿件质量。”
【English Prompt】
“As a journal editor responsible for initial screening and final decisions, please draft a rejection letter based on the manuscript provided. Your letter should: (1) briefly summarize the paper’s topic and main findings; (2) identify the key reasons for rejection, such as insufficient novelty, methodological flaws, inadequate data, or weak conclusions; and (3) maintain a respectful and objective tone while offering feasible suggestions for improvement, ensuring the authors understand how to enhance their future research or submissions.”
2.3.2 退修意见（Major/Minor Revision Letter）
【中文 Prompt】
“作为一名在学术期刊任职多年的高级编辑，请为以下稿件起草一封退修意见书，重点说明需要作者大幅（或小幅）修改的部分。请先肯定论文的优点与潜在贡献，然后分条列出需改进的要点，包括研究设计、数据分析、文献引用、写作风格等具体问题，并提供指导性建议。请保持专业、鼓励的语气，并在结束时说明提交修订稿的相关要求和截止日期（若适用）。”
【English Prompt】
“As a senior editor at an academic journal, please draft a major (or minor) revision letter for the following manuscript. Start by acknowledging the paper’s merits and potential contributions, then systematically enumerate the key areas requiring improvement—such as research design, data analysis, literature citations, or writing style—offering guidance on how to address these issues. Maintain a professional, encouraging tone, and conclude by outlining any requirements or deadlines for submitting the revised version, if applicable.”
2.3.3 接受稿件的修改建议（Acceptance with Revision Notes）
【中文 Prompt】
“作为一位在同行评审与编辑环节均有丰富经验的资深编辑，请根据以下稿件撰写一封接收通知函。需要在文中说明该论文已达到刊发标准，但仍建议作者在正式发表前进行一些小范围的修订或补充，如补充某些数据分析或修正表述不清的段落。请始终保持正式且积极的语气，鼓励作者在发表前最终确认好所有细节和格式。”
【English Prompt】
“As an experienced editor involved in both peer review and editorial processes, please write an acceptance letter for the following manuscript. Indicate that the paper meets the publication criteria but advise the authors to make minor revisions or additions before final publication, such as refining certain data analyses or clarifying ambiguous statements. Maintain a formal yet positive tone, encouraging the authors to finalize all details and formatting prior to publication.”
2.3.4 审稿意见整合与附加说明
【中文 Prompt】
“作为一名期刊编辑，需要针对审稿人A、审稿人B、审稿人C给出的不同意见进行整合，并向作者出具一份综合反馈。请在以下文档中：1）总结三位审稿人的主要肯定与质疑点；2）指出作者应优先处理的问题；3）强调编辑部的最终立场或决定，如需要大修/小修、或暂时搁置等；4）在给作者的行文中保持一致的语气和格式，避免作者因为审稿意见不一致而产生混淆。请注意礼貌、客观和建设性。”
【English Prompt】
“As a journal editor, you need to consolidate the comments from Reviewer A, Reviewer B, and Reviewer C into a single unified response for the authors. Please do the following in the document: (1) summarize the main points of agreement and contention among the three reviewers; (2) highlight the issues the authors should address first; (3) state the editorial office’s final stance or decision, such as major/minor revisions or a provisional hold; and (4) maintain a consistent tone and format to minimize any confusion arising from divergent reviewer opinions. Remember to stay polite, objective, and constructive.”
2.3.5 针对作者的建设性引导与鼓励
【中文 Prompt】
“作为一名致力于帮助作者不断提升论文质量的编辑，请撰写一封具有引导意义的反馈信。在信中除批注问题外，还需要：1）具体说明如何利用期刊的资源（如模板、格式指南等）进行修改；2）鼓励作者在后续研究中加强与其他学科或领域的跨学科合作；3）提示作者可以在论文的附录或补充材料中提供更多数据或图表，以增强论文的整体说服力。请保持积极、友善的编辑语气，让作者对后续修订充满信心。”
【English Prompt】
“As an editor committed to helping authors continually improve their manuscripts, please compose a feedback letter that serves as a guiding document. In addition to pointing out issues, the letter should: (1) specify how to utilize journal resources (e.g., templates, formatting guidelines) for revisions; (2) encourage cross-disciplinary collaboration in future research; and (3) suggest the inclusion of additional data or figures in appendices or supplementary materials to strengthen the paper’s overall impact. Maintain a positive, supportive editorial tone that instills confidence in the authors’ revision process.”
2.3.6 最终决定说明（如：接受、拒绝后重投等）
【中文 Prompt】
“作为期刊主编，请针对以下稿件撰写一份最终决定说明，包括对作者的致谢、对审稿人投入的肯定，以及对该稿件目前处理状态（如直接接受、拒绝后允许重新投稿、或无限期搁置）的简要解释。若是拒绝后重投的情况，请附上具体的重新提交条件或改进方向；若是直接接受，则可以在文末提示作者如何完善校样或准备封面图/摘要等必要附加材料。”
【English Prompt】
“As the editor-in-chief of the journal, please draft a statement detailing the final decision for the following manuscript, including expressions of gratitude to the authors and acknowledgement of the reviewers’ contributions, as well as a brief explanation of the current status (e.g., outright acceptance, rejection with an option to resubmit, or indefinite deferral). If the decision is a ‘reject but resubmit,’ include specific guidelines or directions for resubmission; if the paper is accepted outright, add a reminder at the end for authors to finalize proofs or prepare any required supplementary materials (e.g., cover images, abstracts).”
三、 其他常见高频提示词
本章将介绍除学术写作润色、同行评审与编辑反馈之外，在学术论文写作流程中经常会用到的其他类型高频提示词，包括多语言翻译、文献总结与引用，以及论文整体结构与组织等方面。通过以下提示词，研究者可以快速生成更准确、规范的学术文本，并进一步优化论文整体质量。
3.1 学术论文翻译
随着全球化学术交流的日益频繁，多语言环境下的准确沟通显得至关重要。以下提示词可帮助作者或译者在不同语言之间进行高质量的学术翻译，并保持术语一致性、语气严谨及文化适配性。
3.1.1 术语一致性与专业表达
【中文 Prompt】
“作为一名熟悉 [研究领域] 专业术语的学术翻译专家，请帮助我对以下文本进行准确的翻译和润色。请确保所有关键术语在整个文本中保持一致，并使用在该领域得到广泛接受的标准化表达方式。如果发现已有译文不够专业或存有歧义，请提供更恰当的替换词或句式，并标明原因。”
【English Prompt】
“As an academic translation specialist with expertise in [Research Field] terminology, please assist me in accurately translating and refining the following text. Ensure that all key terms remain consistent throughout, using standardized expressions widely recognized in the field. If any existing translations appear unprofessional or ambiguous, propose more suitable alternatives or phrasing and explain why they are preferable.”
3.1.2 句子结构与文化背景
【中文 Prompt】
“作为一位了解多语言文化差异并具备学术写作经验的翻译顾问，请帮助我将以下英文（或其他语言）内容翻译为中文时，注意句子结构和行文习惯的差异。若原文有长句或被动语态过多，请酌情进行分句或改写；同时确保在跨文化背景下，不改变核心学术观点的准确性与完整性。若某些概念在中文语境中需要补充注释，请一并说明。”
【English Prompt】
“As a translation consultant versed in cross-cultural differences and academic writing, please help me convert the following English (or other language) content into Chinese, taking into account structural and stylistic nuances. If the source text contains overly long or passive constructions, consider splitting or rephrasing sentences. Make sure the original academic concepts remain accurate and complete in the new cultural context. If some notions require additional clarification in Chinese, please provide footnotes or annotations accordingly.”
3.1.3 多语种摘要与关键词
【中文 Prompt】
“作为一名在多语种学术发表领域有丰富经验的翻译专家，请帮助我为以下论文撰写中英双语（或其他目标语言）摘要和关键词。请确保不同语言版本的摘要在表达内容和学术要点上保持一致，并在关键词中适当包含本领域常用的专业术语，以便提升检索与引用效率。”
【English Prompt】
“As a translation specialist experienced in multilingual academic publishing, please help me compose bilingual (Chinese and English, or other target languages) abstracts and keywords for the following paper. Make sure the abstracts in both languages convey the same content and core academic points, and include commonly used technical terms in the keywords to enhance discoverability and citation potential.”
3.2 文献总结与引用
精准的文献综述和标准化的引用是学术写作中的基础能力。以下提示词旨在帮助研究者快速提炼文献核心观点、总结参考文献要点，同时保证引用格式的合规性。
3.2.1 快速文献综述/摘要提炼
【中文 Prompt】
“作为一名在文献综述写作方面经验丰富的学术助理，请根据我列出的 [文献列表/文章标题]，撰写一段针对 [研究主题] 的综合性文献综述。请注意：1）突出每篇文献的主要贡献；2）在段落之间保持逻辑衔接；3）若文献间存在观点冲突或互补，请适当加以说明。最终文本应控制在 [字数] 左右，并采用客观、中立的学术语气。”
【English Prompt】
“As an experienced academic assistant in literature review writing, please produce a concise literature review paragraph on [Research Topic] based on the [list of references/article titles] I have provided. Make sure to: (1) highlight the key contributions of each source; (2) maintain logical flow between paragraphs; and (3) note any conflicting or complementary perspectives among the studies. Keep the final text within [word count] and use an objective, neutral academic tone.”
3.2.2 引用格式与参考文献管理
【中文 Prompt】
“作为一名熟悉多种学术引用风格（如 APA、Harvard、Chicago）的论文排版专家，请帮助我检查以下文档中所有参考文献的格式是否与 [指定风格] 相匹配，并统一引用方式（如文内标注、脚注或尾注）。若发现格式错误或缺失信息（作者、年份、期刊名等），请给出修正示例；若引用风格有特殊要求（如页码范围、DOI标注），也请一并说明。”
【English Prompt】
“As a paper formatting expert proficient in various citation styles (e.g., APA, Harvard, Chicago), please help me verify whether all references in the following document conform to the [specified style], and standardize the citation approach (in-text citation, footnotes, or endnotes). If you detect any format errors or missing details (authors, year, journal title, etc.), provide corrected examples. Also mention any special requirements for this citation style, such as page ranges or DOIs.”
3.2.3 参考文献的批判性评述
【中文 Prompt】
“作为一名注重批判性思维的学术写作指导，请对以下参考文献列表进行批判性评述。除列出每篇文献的核心发现或观点外，请指出其可能的研究局限或方法学不足，并建议如何在当前研究中借鉴或改进这些局限。请在行文中保持学术客观性，避免主观化或情绪化的评价，并提供简要的引用出处或备注。”
【English Prompt】
“As an academic writing mentor emphasizing critical thinking, please critique the following list of references. In addition to summarizing the key findings or perspectives from each source, identify any potential limitations or methodological gaps and suggest ways these shortcomings can be addressed or improved in the current research. Maintain academic objectivity and avoid subjective or emotional language, providing brief citations or notes where relevant.”
3.3 论文结构与组织
论文的整体结构与组织不仅影响读者的阅读体验，也直接关系到研究逻辑的呈现效果。以下提示词可帮助研究者在章节安排、段落布局和标题选取上更具条理性和说服力。
3.3.1 章节框架与逻辑过渡
【中文 Prompt】
“作为一名经验丰富的学术论文设计顾问，请帮助我根据以下研究主题或大纲，规划出一套合理的章节框架，包括每个章节的标题、目的和主要内容，并说明如何在章节之间实现顺畅的逻辑过渡。若发现研究流程或信息组织存在缺口，请提出补充或调整方案，使论文结构更紧凑、易于读者理解。”
【English Prompt】
“As an experienced consultant in academic paper design, please help me develop a coherent chapter framework based on the following research topic or outline. Provide section headings, objectives, and main points for each chapter, and explain how to maintain logical transitions between sections. If any gaps or inconsistencies appear in the research process or information organization, suggest ways to fill or rearrange them to create a more cohesive and reader-friendly structure.”
3.3.2 标题与小节设计
【中文 Prompt】
“作为一名擅长精炼与聚焦主题的学术编辑，请在审阅以下论文内容时，为主要章节或小节设计更精准、有吸引力的标题，确保标题能概括段落核心要点并与整体研究目标相一致。若有必要，也可在小节内部增设合乎逻辑的子标题，用来区分不同的论点或分析层次，并简要说明这样做的理由。”
【English Prompt】
“As an academic editor skilled in concise and topic-focused writing, please review the following paper content and propose more precise, engaging headings for the main chapters or sections. Ensure that each heading accurately reflects the core point of the corresponding paragraph and aligns with the study’s overall aims. If needed, introduce logical subheadings within a section to differentiate various arguments or analytical levels, explaining why such changes would be beneficial.”
3.3.3 摘要与结论的衔接
【中文 Prompt】
“作为一位熟悉论文整体结构安排的学术写作顾问，请帮助我检查以下论文的摘要和结论部分是否存在衔接不良或信息重复的问题。若发现摘要中未充分体现论文的关键结论或创新点，请提出补充要点；若结论部分缺乏与摘要的呼应或缺少对研究意义的进一步阐述，也请给出修正建议，以实现两者之间的自然呼应。”
【English Prompt】
“As an academic writing consultant experienced in overall paper organization, please examine whether the abstract and conclusion sections of the following manuscript exhibit any mismatches or redundant information. If the abstract doesn’t adequately highlight the paper’s key findings or novel contributions, suggest additional points to include. If the conclusion lacks alignment with the abstract or fails to elaborate on the significance of the research, recommend revisions to ensure a coherent linkage between the two.”
四、小结
在本指南中，我们系统梳理了生成式人工智能（如 GPT）在学术写作各个环节中可能发挥的作用及其相应的提示词。从基础的语法与风格润色到更高阶的同行评审辅助与编辑反馈优化，再到涵盖翻译、文献管理、论文结构等常见高频需求，整合后的提示词不仅有助于研究者快速实现文本的语言精修，也能在评审与投稿流程中高效产出专业、建设性的意见。通过分章、分节的方式，读者可以依据自身写作与审稿的进度，迅速找到所需的指令，结合多轮迭代与反馈，获得更贴近实际需求的输出。
需要强调的是，AI 工具的应用应与研究者的批判性思维相辅相成。无论是润色文本、审阅论文还是撰写编辑信件，都离不开对学术伦理与严谨性的坚持。在享受技术带来的便捷时，务必牢记保持学术诚信、尊重隐私与数据安全，并对生成的内容进行必要的人工审校。只有在这样理性且谨慎的使用模式下，才能真正释放 GPT 在学术写作中的潜力，为研究成果的传播与深化提供持续的驱动力。