当前位置: 首页 > article >正文

Ubuntu 优化启动时间优化

优化 Ubuntu 20.04 的启动时间可以从多个方面入手,以下是详细的步骤和建议:


一、分析启动耗时

首先检查系统启动各阶段的耗时:

systemd-analyze time        # 查看整体启动时间
systemd-analyze blame       # 列出各服务/进程的启动耗时
systemd-analyze critical-chain  # 查看关键路径的启动链

二、禁用不必要的服务

禁用启动时不需要的系统服务:

sudo systemctl disable <service-name>  # 禁用服务(如蓝牙、打印机等)
sudo systemctl mask <service-name>     # 彻底屏蔽服务(谨慎使用)

常见可禁用的服务

  • bluetooth.service(蓝牙)
  • cups.service(打印机)
  • ModemManager.service(调制解调器)
  • networkd-dispatcher.service(若使用NetworkManager)
  • accounts-daemon.service(用户账户管理)

三、优化文件系统检查(fsck)

  1. 减少文件系统检查频率

    • 编辑 /etc/fstab,将最后一列的数值改为 0(表示不检查):
      sudo nano /etc/fstab
      # 示例:将最后数字从 1 或 2 改为 0
      UUID=xxxx / ext4 defaults,noatime,discard 0 0
      
    • 使用 noatimerelatime 挂载选项减少磁盘写入。
  2. 禁用启动时的文件系统等待

    sudo systemctl disable systemd-fsck-root.service
    

四、调整内核参数

  1. 编辑 GRUB 配置

    sudo nano /etc/default/grub
    # 修改以下参数:
    GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT="quiet splash"
    # 添加或修改为(例如):
    GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT="quiet splash noresume fsck.mode=skip"
    
    • fsck.mode=skip:跳过文件系统检查(谨慎使用)。
    • noresume:如果未使用休眠功能。
  2. 更新 GRUB:

    sudo update-grub
    

五、优化 SSD 性能(如使用 SSD)

  1. 启用 TRIM:
    sudo systemctl enable fstrim.timer
    
  2. 确认是否已启用 discard 选项(在 /etc/fstab 中添加 discard)。

六、清理启动项

  1. 管理用户级启动程序
    gnome-session-properties  # 图形界面管理启动项
    
  2. 清理旧内核
    sudo apt autoremove --purge  # 删除旧内核和依赖
    

七、排查硬件问题

  1. 检查硬盘健康状况
    sudo smartctl -a /dev/sda
    
  2. 检查日志中的硬件错误
    journalctl -b -p 3  # 查看本次启动的错误日志
    

八、使用轻量化组件

  • 替换图形界面为轻量级桌面(如 Xfce 或 LXQt)。
  • 使用更快的显示管理器(如 lightdm 替代 gdm3):
    sudo apt install lightdm
    sudo dpkg-reconfigure lightdm
    

九、其他优化

  1. 减少 GRUB 等待时间
    sudo nano /etc/default/grub
    GRUB_TIMEOUT=2  # 将默认超时时间改为2秒
    sudo update-grub
    
  2. 预加载内核模块
    • 将常用模块添加到 /etc/modules-load.d/modules.conf

十、验证优化结果

重启后再次运行:

systemd-analyze time
systemd-analyze blame

通过以上步骤,大部分情况下可以显著缩短启动时间。如果问题依旧存在,可能需要进一步排查特定服务或硬件兼容性问题。

我的结果:
  1. 最开始的时候:
> systemd-analyze time
Startup finished in 22.227s (firmware) + 9.423s (loader) + 36.324s (kernel) + 1min 51.738s (userspace) = 2min 59.713s 
graphical.target reached after 1min 51.722s in userspace
> systemd-analyze blame
20.870s plymouth-quit-wait.service                                             >
 4.621s NetworkManager-wait-online.service                                     >
 3.019s dev-sda2.device                                                        >
 1.329s fwupd.service                                                          >
  459ms docker.service                                                         >
  391ms snapd.service                                                          >
  387ms man-db.service                                                         >
  305ms blueman-mechanism.service                                              >
  299ms systemd-logind.service                                                 >
  278ms dev-loop0.device                                                       >
  267ms logrotate.service                                                      >
  264ms upower.service                                                         >
  255ms snap-core22-1722.mount                                                 >
  241ms snap-core20-2496.mount                                                 >
  239ms dev-loop2.device                                                       >
  235ms snap-gnome\x2d3\x2d28\x2d1804-198.mount                                >
  234ms containerd.service                                                     >
  232ms snap-gnome\x2d3\x2d38\x2d2004-143.mount                                >
  232ms snap-gnome\x2d42\x2d2204-176.mount                                     >
  229ms snap-gnome\x2d42\x2d2204-202.mount                                     >
  227ms snap-gtk\x2dcommon\x2dthemes-1535.mount                                >
  226ms dev-loop11.device                                                      >


> systemd-analyze critical-chain
The time when unit became active or started is printed after the "@" character.
The time the unit took to start is printed after the "+" character.

graphical.target @1min 51.722s
└─multi-user.target @1min 51.722s
  └─kerneloops.service @1min 35.442s +13ms
    └─nss-lookup.target @1min 35.440s
      └─todeskd.service @1min 35.439s
        └─network-online.target @1min 35.436s
          └─NetworkManager-wait-online.service @1min 30.814s +4.621s
            └─NetworkManager.service @1min 30.736s +71ms
              └─dbus.service @1min 30.733s
                └─basic.target @1min 30.712s
                  └─sockets.target @1min 30.712s
                    └─uuidd.socket @1min 30.710s
                      └─sysinit.target @1min 30.699s
                        └─systemd-timesyncd.service @3.507s +97ms
                          └─systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service @3.486s +16ms
                            └─systemd-journal-flush.service @562ms +106ms
                              └─systemd-journald.service @458ms +103ms
                                └─systemd-journald.socket @451ms
                                  └─system.slice @445ms
                                    └─-.slice @445ms

  1. 优化了一下启动项的图像加载,禁用了plymouth图像加载
 5263  sudo systemctl mask plymouth-quit-wait.service
 5264  sudo apt remove plymouth
 5265  sudo nano /etc/default/grub
 5266  sudo update-grub
> systemd-analyze time
Startup finished in 20.682s (firmware) + 5.135s (loader) + 4.417s (kernel) + 1min 37.067s (userspace) = 2min 7.302s 
graphical.target reached after 1min 37.059s in userspace
> systemd-analyze blame
4.897s NetworkManager-wait-online.service                                      >
1.456s fwupd.service                                                           >
1.328s docker.service                                                          >
 711ms dev-sda2.device                                                         >
 681ms snapd.seeded.service                                                    >
 620ms man-db.service                                                          >
 594ms snapd.service                                                           >
 504ms networkd-dispatcher.service                                             >
 419ms blueman-mechanism.service                                               >
 322ms dev-loop0.device                                                        >
 298ms dev-loop1.device                                                        >
 298ms apport-autoreport.service                                               >
 293ms containerd.service                                                      >
 292ms dev-loop2.device                                                        >
 287ms upower.service                                                          >
 279ms logrotate.service                                                       >
 270ms systemd-logind.service                                                  >
 269ms dev-loop4.device                                                        >
 256ms dev-loop8.device                                                        >
 252ms dev-loop10.device                                                       >
 249ms dev-loop5.device                                                        >
 247ms dev-loop6.device                                                        >
 242ms accounts-daemon.service                                                 >
 241ms dev-loop3.device                                                        >
 236ms snap-core18-2846.mount                                                  >
 232ms fstrim.service                                                          >
 221ms udisks2.service                                                         >
 218ms snap-gnome\x2d42\x2d2204-176.mount                                      >
 217ms snap-gnome\x2d42\x2d2204-202.mount                                      >
 213ms dev-loop9.device                                                        >
 213ms dev-loop11.device                                                       >
 208ms snap-snap\x2dstore-1113.mount                                           >
 205ms snap-snapd-23545.mount                                                  >
 204ms dev-loop17.device                                                       >
 204ms dev-loop18.device                                                       >
 204ms snap-snapd-23771.mount                                                  >
 197ms dev-loop16.device                                                       >
 197ms dev-loop7.device                                                        >
 188ms dev-loop15.device                                                       >
 186ms systemd-resolved.service                                                >
 185ms smartmontools.service                                                   >
 182ms snap-core20-2496.mount                                                  >
 180ms snap-core22-1722.mount                                                  >
 179ms snap-core22-1748.mount                                                  >
 175ms snap-gnome\x2d3\x2d38\x2d2004-119.mount                                 >
 172ms dev-loop13.device                                                       >
 172ms snap-snap\x2dstore-1216.mount                                           >
 168ms systemd-timesyncd.service                                               >
 165ms snap-notion\x2dsnap\x2dreborn-49.mount                                  >
 164ms dev-loop14.device                                                       >
 161ms dev-loop12.device                                                       >
 150ms lm-sensors.service                                                      >
 146ms apparmor.service                                                        >
 136ms systemd-udev-trigger.service                                            >
 136ms gpu-manager.service                                                     >
 135ms ModemManager.service                                                    >
 134ms snap-core18-2855.mount                                                  >
 120ms avahi-daemon.service                                                    >
 116ms bluetooth.service                                                       >
 116ms systemd-journal-flush.service                                           >
 114ms snap-gtk\x2dcommon\x2dthemes-1535.mount                                 >
 111ms NetworkManager.service                                                  >
 110ms snap-notion\x2dsnap\x2dreborn-50.mount                                  >
 109ms systemd-journald.service                                                >
 103ms polkit.service                                                          >

> systemd-analyze critical-chain
The time when unit became active or started is printed after the "@" character.
The time the unit took to start is printed after the "+" character.

graphical.target @1min 37.059s
└─multi-user.target @1min 37.059s
  └─docker.service @1min 35.730s +1.328s
    └─nss-lookup.target @1min 35.729s
      └─todeskd.service @1min 35.729s
        └─network-online.target @1min 35.726s
          └─NetworkManager-wait-online.service @1min 30.829s +4.897s
            └─NetworkManager.service @1min 30.714s +111ms
              └─dbus.service @1min 30.708s
                └─basic.target @1min 30.688s
                  └─sockets.target @1min 30.688s
                    └─snapd.socket @1min 30.686s +1ms
                      └─sysinit.target @1min 30.671s
                        └─systemd-timesyncd.service @1.249s +168ms
                          └─systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service @1.207s +37ms
                            └─systemd-journal-flush.service @584ms +116ms
                              └─systemd-journald.service @473ms +109ms
                                └─systemd-journald.socket @466ms
                                  └─system.slice @461ms
                                    └─-.slice @461ms

http://www.kler.cn/a/611341.html

相关文章:

  • GraalVM 和 传统 JVM(HotSpot/JDK) 的详细对比,涵盖执行模式、性能、生态、适用场景等方面,并附上总结和选择建议
  • Java多线程与高并发专题——CountDownLatch 是如何安排线程执行顺序的?
  • leetcode11.盛水最多的容器
  • FFmpeg开发学习:AVFormatContext结构体
  • 小程序内表格合并功能实现—行合并
  • Spring MVC:关于@PostMapping和@GetMapping的使用场景、区别及核心要点的总结
  • javaweb后端登录功能cookie session
  • CVE-2020-0796:永恒之黑实战学习
  • 鸿蒙-全屏播放页面(使用相对布局)---持续更新中
  • 爬虫:Requests-HTML的详细使用
  • SiLU与GeLU激活函数:现代大模型的选择
  • Selenium 简单入门操作示例
  • MySQL基础知识与函数
  • (UI自动化测试web端)第二篇:元素定位的方法_css定位之层级选择器
  • IoTDB看门狗配置后不生效
  • 【docker】docker-compose安装RabbitMQ
  • charles接口测试(断点测试)
  • ctfshow WEB web5
  • JavaScript 改变 HTML 图像
  • [Lc_3 回溯] 决策树 | 全排列 | 子集